If Canon legal comes knocking on ML's front door, I'd say first thing he might do, is contact the EFF and try to get them on his side with their legal help/advice. Canon might get more spread and publicity of this type code rather than stiffling it.īut generally, if you're doing a clean room reverse engineer on hardware you bought and own, with no NDA's signed, etc.you should be perfectly legal. However, if Canon were to do this, the "Streisand Effect" might take place, especially if he's released the code open source and other people take the code and join in the efforts. These days, it doesn't matter if you have a legal case or not.it is deep pockets that often win. Magic Lantern to get a Clean HDMI Live Video from old DSLR 13,844 views Apr 11. However, Canon can still throw legal threats around if they wish, whether they have merit or not. For example, the Canon 5D Mark III has clean HDMI output, but the audio. Anamorphic lens screwed on 50mm or 85mm lens for widescreen cinema look. One is allowed to do what they wish with hardware they purchase (at least still for now, although the corps are trying more and more to infringe on that).so, this should be perfectly legal. How is it tested: Canon 5D and 50D fixed on one rig. This hack doesn't allow you to circumvent copyrighted material. He isn't doing anything that helps 'circumvent' safe guards.like people have come down on gaming mods for. RenatoPhoto's answer was somewhat what I was looking for.Well, if ML is doing a clean room reverse engineer of the camera, that should be perfectly legal.
I was hoping to learn more about what that meant, especially for slow mo.Īnyways, thanks for the help. I can see here that the buffer when hacked, is changed from 32x4 to 32圆. What I couldn't find, was in what ways can the ML hack push this limit, for example, the kind of affects the buffer size hack can have, enabling few more seconds of full 1080p HD slow mo. In our test, the buffer was growing at a very slow rate, so the firmware wont do that rate. I also know that the 5D3 by default can write 100 MB/s to a CF card. ML benchmarks the card as more than fast enough to handle 1080p. It was this lack of discussion on why the 1080p 60 fps was not possible that got me curious. Wouldn't you have been more helpful if you had just written out these said limitations, instead of saying "Read a little about Magic Lantern". Magic Lantern 2017 Video Cinematic Footage Test DSLR Cinema Movies 1.540 3:33. This thread is about understanding the technical reasons behind the existing 60 fps full HD limitations on the 5D3 with ML. It is aimed to pick on what the ML pros think (isn't that what this forum is about!?).
My A7R questions is way different, for a different section, focusing on all the capabilities of these new cameras and where the innovation is leading in the future, and what it means for the 5D3 ML space in its entirety.
0 kommentar(er)
